In Command...Again

[sourdough]

We recently had a thread about "do you like In Command" and my takeaway was that for the majority it was a negative. Most of the comments seemed to center around "connectivity" etc. Some commented that it was nice to bring in the awning...I have a remote for that already. I don't want to rehash that thread but what I'm interested in wasn't really addressed it didn't seem.

I am seriously considering another trailer. I truly like Keystone's floorplans but have some issues with some aspects as anyone who follows me knows. The In Command system looks to me like a show stopper. I'm not interested in "connectivity" I just want it to work as well, and as reliably, as switches. It appears to me that it doesn't and the jury is still out if the control panel just dies...then what?

Looking at a new Grand Design they have chosen to stick with the switches (smart) while Keystone has moved to the unreliable (as best I can tell) In Command. I like the Keystone better than the Grand Design due to a couple of things plus the 10% increase in pricing for the name. At this moment however I'm thinking In Command isn't worth the trouble.

For those that have it, from just a use standpoint...not connectivity, not "talking" to it from afar, but just making things work; how has it worked for that? Any catastrophic failures leaving you immobilized? I appreciate any feedback.