Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 

Go Back   Keystone RV Forums > Keystone Tech Forums > Tires, Tires, Tires!
Click Here to Login

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 01-19-2016, 06:35 PM   #1
gearhead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Liberty, Texas
Posts: 5,021
Nitrogen??

Anyone filled their tires with N2? I think I understand that it is more temperature stable, but what do you so if you need a tire serviced while on the road? Fill with air and then get N2 later? Who has N2 in a tire store? I've never seen it, but I haven't asked either.
__________________
2018 Ram 3500 Laramie CC DRW LWB 4X4 Cummins Aisin 3.73
Reese Goosebox 20K
2018 Heartland Landmark 365 Oshkosh
2008 Bigfoot 25C9.4 LB Cabover
gearhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 07:37 PM   #2
chuckster57
Site Team
 
chuckster57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Modesto
Posts: 20,203
I think the chain "Americas tire store" has it, but you have to request it. I have seen some brands come from the factory with nitrogen filled tires. The green cap on the valve stem identifies it.

The earths atmosphere is roughly 80% nitrogen, so the argument about benefits is one of those subjects that cause long discussions/debates.

In the racing field, I can see it as a benefit, for everyday driving/towing I personally don't see the "need" for it.
__________________

2012 Copper Canyon 273FWRET being towed by a 1994 Ford F350 CC,LB,Dually diesel.
Airlift 5000 bags, Prodigy brake control, 5 gauges on the pillar.Used to tow a '97 Jayco 323RKS.

Now an RVIA registered tech. Retired from Law enforcement in 2008 after 25+ yrs.
chuckster57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 07:59 PM   #3
JRTJH
Site Team
 
JRTJH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Gaylord
Posts: 26,772
There have been a number of threads on the forum about the benefits/non-benefits of using nitrogen in RV tires. I can't remember any thread that had any conclusive evidence that actually demonstrated any advantage that was cost effective or that substantially improved performance, safety or durability of the tires. ST tires are essentially "low tech" tires. I could see using nitrogen in "high performance aircraft", "dragsters" (where explosions could occur), and in "racing environments" where consistent high speed applications would be expected. In a 65 MPH trailer application, I can't see where the "extra 20% nitrogen" would be beneficial. Of course, if you really want to, who's to say you shouldn't spend your money any way you like......

Trailer Life did an article on RV tires some time back. Here is their direct quote on the subject:

"Nitrogen Inflation Green tire-valve caps denote the tires were inflated with nitrogen instead of atmospheric air. Nitrogen has some limited advantages over air, although no tire manufacturer requires the use of nitrogen. Atmospheric air contains about 79 percent nitrogen, and it’s impractical to inflate tires with 100 percent pure nitrogen, because the tire contains some air even when deflated. Therefore, if your vehicle’s tires have nitrogen in them, leave it in. Never run with lower pressure than needed due to an unavailability of nitrogen; use air to maintain pressure, if that’s what is available."

You can access the entire article here: http://www.trailerlife.com/trailer-h.../rv-tires-101/
__________________
John



2015 F250 6.7l 4x4
2014 Cougar X Lite 27RKS
JRTJH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 08:49 PM   #4
GaryWT
Senior Member
 
GaryWT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: MA
Posts: 3,153
My understanding is the psi is more consistent as the tire heats and the tires last longer than ones filled with air. You can add air to them but it lowers the benefits over time.
__________________
2013 Premier 31BHPR
2014 F350 6.2L
Soon to be just DW and I
GaryWT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2016, 04:25 AM   #5
bsmith0404
Senior Member
 
bsmith0404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Las Cruces
Posts: 4,665
Research I have done seems to be pretty consistent on the subject, nitrogen is dryer, is affected less by temp changes, and bleeds through the rubber less than oxygen. How much difference does it make over regular atmospheric air that is 79% nitrogen?

Here's my thoughts, first to be done properly, nitrogen filled tires must be purged several times to remove as much of the oxygen and moisture from the tire as possible to get the level of pure nitrogen as high as possible in order to see the maximum effect. The machines that most tire shops use do this automatically, but it comes at a price.
I have thought about doing it with my RV tires, but decided not to for one reason. Nitrogen is more stable than regular air, but it still changes with temps. Considering the fact that I could be towing in January where cold pressure temps could be in the 30s, or I could be towing in July when col pressure temps could be in the 100s, it's obvious that the cold pressures would be different and require adjustment. Do I really want to go to a tire shop with a nitrogen system in order to adjust my cold pressures? I did find nitrogen tire inflation kits for around $300, but you still need to find a place to fill the tank. Cost vs benefit just isn't there in my opinion.
__________________

Brent
2013 Alpine 3500RE
2019 Silverado 2500HD Duramax
U.S. Air Force Retired (25 yrs)
bsmith0404 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2016, 06:59 PM   #6
Hideout17
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: pA
Posts: 77
As said before in racing i used it because it didn't build as much air pressure when tires got hot as regular air does. A drier system like body shops use could do similar. The cost of nitrogen and the BS that goes with it is just that BS. If you do fill your tires with nitrogen regular air can be used to top them off.
Hideout17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2016, 12:12 AM   #7
denverpilot
Senior Member
 
denverpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by bsmith0404 View Post
Research I have done seems to be pretty consistent on the subject, nitrogen is dryer, is affected less by temp changes, and bleeds through the rubber less than oxygen.

I love that "bleeds through the rubber" thing about O2. Here's why.

If I fill the tire with regular air and much of the O2 "bleeds out" what do I have left? N.

Put in a little bit more regular air, a little bit more O goes in with it.

It "bleeds out". Now I have even more total N.

After about what? Say four regular air fills I should be getting close to 100% N anyway, for free!!

Hehhehe. Or: Not enough O2 "bleeds" anywhere to actually make a considerable difference.

Can't really have it both ways.

Science!

Tell me how much O2 "bleeds out" over how much time and anyone can write the fractions math to tell you how many refills it'll take of regular air to get to 100% N in the tire, turned O2 sieve.

Next step is to calculate how much money you'll save by just waiting for the tire to do all the work for you!

Therefore, my usual advice: If you can do N fills for free, go for it. If not, don't bother.
__________________
Pilot for fun, Computer geek for a living, and happy 5er owner who wants more time to go play in the camper!
denverpilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2016, 03:18 AM   #8
notanlines
Senior Member
 
notanlines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Germantown, TN
Posts: 6,300
Denver has made a believer out of me. We'll just tell people we have the "regular" nitrogen fill (80%) not the "premium" nitrogen fill (100%).
__________________
Jim in Memphis, Wife of 51 years is Brenda
2019 F450 6.7 Powerstroke
2018 Mobile Suites 40RSSA
2021 40' Jayco Eagle
2001 Road king w/matching Harley sidecar
2021 Yamaha X2 Wolverine 1000
notanlines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2016, 06:12 PM   #9
PerryB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 296
I think nitrogen came into use in aircraft that experience large temperature swings in their operating environments. Think of a commercial airliner that leaves Texas and lands in Michigan. How much more temperature stable is it? I don't know. I don't see it having any real advantages in most daily applications though.
__________________
2011 F-350 C.C. 4X4 LWB 6.7PSD
2010 Montana Mountaineer 345DBQ
2005 F150 FX4
PerryB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2016, 11:27 PM   #10
Desert185
Senior Member
 
Desert185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Nevada
Posts: 2,695
http://www.nitrogentiremachine.com/f...nistration.htm

The use of nitrogen also reduces degradation of the casing and oxidation of the wheel due to exposure to oxygen, but the reality is that N2 is not practical for our purposes.
__________________
Desert185 🇺🇸 (Retired Chemtrail vendor)
-Ram 2500 QC, LB, 4x4, Cummins HO/exhaust brake, 6-speed stick.
-Andersen Ultimate 24K 5er Hitch.
-2014 Cougar 326SRX, Maxxis tires w/TPMS, wet bolts, two 6v batts.
-Four Wheel 8' Popup Camper.
Desert185 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2016, 03:31 PM   #11
Bigg-limo
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Chandler, Az
Posts: 32
I filled my tires on my Fuzion with nitrogen before I picked it up. In the three years that I've owned it,...I've never had to "add air" to it. Didn't matter whether it was 25* in the winter,...or 115* in the summer. It was always the same. Over the years since,....I've read post after post about how it was or is a rip off. My experience has been different.
Bigg-limo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2016, 10:00 PM   #12
denverpilot
Senior Member
 
denverpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by PerryB View Post
I think nitrogen came into use in aircraft that experience large temperature swings in their operating environments. Think of a commercial airliner that leaves Texas and lands in Michigan. How much more temperature stable is it? I don't know. I don't see it having any real advantages in most daily applications though.

In aircraft there are two reasons...

The temperature swings you mentioned, and they're way bigger than just going city to city... Think about what temperature a wheel well is at 38,000 feet above sea level...

And moisture content. Most of the N fills on aircraft are also very sure the N is very very dry. An ice chunk that has adhered to the inside wall of a tire that goes from 0 to over 100 mph in the blink of an eye, is a heck of a balance problem.

Many aircraft also have special tires with "chines" or extensions that stick out and help deflect foreign objects that get thrown up off of a runway, away from the aircraft. The most commonly seen aircraft most people have seen with them, would probably be the LearJet.

Tossing trash from the runway into those low mounted twin engines on the fuselage near the tail during a takeoff from a slightly fouled runway (water, ice chunks, rocks, whatever) could make for a "bad day" at departure time.

Having a tire expand to the point where it gets "stuck" in a wheel well could also be a "bad day" when it comes time to drop the gear to land. Usually that's handled by strict pressure limits when filling them. (Very rare to see the equivalent of TPM on aircraft.) And careful engineering design to allow for expansion at very high altitudes -- where you probably wouldn't be dropping the gear anyway.

(But you might. Read up on what actually must happen after a decompression at high altitude. All that nice talk about calmy putting the yellow mask over your mouth and nose doesn't really describe the screaming descent at barber pole that needs to occur... some aircraft call for tossing the gear out to add to the drag on the way down. All depends on the airplane but it isn't going to be a calm ride down... Gotta get the airplane below 12,000 or so, and usually to 10,000 so everyone can breathe again... The folks in the cockpit get a nice pressure mask to accomplish that dive...)

So anyway... I don't think N is really worth it in stuff that's just tooling down the highway -- and is not hanging out at lower pressures and lower temperatures similar to say, what one would find on the way up Mt Everest ...

But I won't argue too hard with someone h***-bent on putting N into road tires. It's their money. I've spent money on much dumber things.

It just isn't for the same reasons, is all.
__________________
Pilot for fun, Computer geek for a living, and happy 5er owner who wants more time to go play in the camper!
denverpilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2016, 05:43 AM   #13
gkainz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Arvada, CO
Posts: 708
I switched all my tires to helium. I gained 500 lbs of CCW on the truck and 800 lbs on the 5er.




The only thing I have to really be careful with is when my fuel tank gets down below 1/4 tank, I have to get help with tiedowns so the truck doesn't float away.


Personally, I ask for the 80% Nitrogen mix at the tire shops, too.
__________________
2010 Laredo 245RL
2007 Dodge Ram 2500 CTD 4x4
Andersen Ultimate Gooseneck mount
gkainz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2016, 11:17 AM   #14
CWtheMan
Senior Member
 
CWtheMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Taylors, SC
Posts: 3,031
Some references.

http://www.firestonecompleteautocare...ogen-in-tires/

http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/n...tudy/index.htm

https://powertank.com/truth.or.hype/

I worked in Naval Aviation for more than 40 years (31 active & 10 civilian). Using 100% nitrogen in our tires wasn't a choice, it was a regulation. My rating included tires, wheels, landing gear and pneumatics.
CWtheMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2016, 11:38 AM   #15
PerryB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 296
Those are some interesting links. The last one pretty well sums it up. The only real advantage to nitrogen is it doesn't support combustion, and THATS why its used in aircraft tires. Well, heavy commercial and military anyway. I don't think I'm going to worry about it.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	20140611_181137.jpg
Views:	102
Size:	97.7 KB
ID:	9928  
__________________
2011 F-350 C.C. 4X4 LWB 6.7PSD
2010 Montana Mountaineer 345DBQ
2005 F150 FX4
PerryB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2016, 04:20 PM   #16
Pmedic4
Senior Member
 
Pmedic4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Illinois
Posts: 581
N2 in the tires

Quote:
Originally Posted by PerryB View Post
Those are some interesting links. The last one pretty well sums it up. The only real advantage to nitrogen is it doesn't support combustion, and THATS why its used in aircraft tires. Well, heavy commercial and military anyway. I don't think I'm going to worry about it.
Seems like the biggest advantage is likely more money to the installer. I'd seen some dealer markups for as much as $120 for 4 tires. If your really interested, you can get a small cylinder of nitrogen for about $15 (plus cylinder rental), which will probably fill about 40 tires.

I was surprised, the second article mentioned Nitrogen was an inert gas, and that's not true, there are many compounds of nitrogen, and common to Diesel engines is nitrogen oxides, and why DEF is used, but all vehicle emit NO(x) gases. One of my 'favorite' nitrogen compounds was nitrogen triiodide, which is even more reactive than nitroglycerin, so it was fun to make small amounts and place on filter paper and explode with a yardstick - releasing a cloud of purple iodine smoke.
__________________
Ed & Mary

2017 Cougar 333MKS
2015 RAM 3500 HD with 6.4L

Pmedic4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2016, 02:32 AM   #17
PerryB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 296
Nitrogen triiodide you say? Sounds like fun. I'll have to put my 16 year old on to that, he's our resident pyro. We have a thousand acres out in the sticks and have a lot of fun making things go boom. We've dispatched a number of old microwaves and mini-fridges with a few pounds of Tannerite.
__________________
2011 F-350 C.C. 4X4 LWB 6.7PSD
2010 Montana Mountaineer 345DBQ
2005 F150 FX4
PerryB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2016, 05:23 AM   #18
msp2jxr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Crossville
Posts: 305
It was explained to me the only time nitrogen is a real benefit is when the nitrogen is vacuumed into the tire and you have pure nitrogen. The shops I have seen adding nitrogen do not VACUME the nitrogen into the tire so you still have air in the tire which really defeats most of the purpose. It is really an advertising gimmick to sell trailers or cars. Jay
__________________
Jay and Lori
2016 Impact 311
2015 Cougar 337 FLS (retired)
2012 Cougar 326MKS (retired)
Mor-Ryde Pin Box
2015 Super Duty F350 6.7 4x4 King Ranch
2008 Super Duty F250 6.4 Diesel 4x4 Lariat (retired)
2005 Goldwing
msp2jxr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2016, 08:59 AM   #19
Steve S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: B.C
Posts: 1,399
I use nitrogen in my Audi 7 as it has low profile tires and it makes a world of difference! I rarely check the pressure as it's always the same and I need it to be the same as the last thing that I need is a tire to blow at 200 kms while throwing it into a corner
My tire guy is on the fence about nitrogen in my work truck as he figures that there's no need for it.
As for a trailer I think it's a great idea as nitrogen keeps all 4 tires at a constant pressure and you're less likely to have a blowout.
I think that I pay an extra $25.00 per tire for nitrogen and that's pretty cheap when it comes to safety
__________________
2010 Keystone Cougar 25 RL.
Steve S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2016, 05:58 PM   #20
Desert185
Senior Member
 
Desert185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Nevada
Posts: 2,695
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve S View Post
I use nitrogen in my Audi 7 as it has low profile tires and it makes a world of difference! I rarely check the pressure as it's always the same and I need it to be the same as the last thing that I need is a tire to blow at 200 kms while throwing it into a corner
My tire guy is on the fence about nitrogen in my work truck as he figures that there's no need for it.
As for a trailer I think it's a great idea as nitrogen keeps all 4 tires at a constant pressure and you're less likely to have a blowout.
I think that I pay an extra $25.00 per tire for nitrogen and that's pretty cheap when it comes to safety
"200 kms while throwing it into a corner" and "safety" with a on N2 in tires for $25/per.

Sorry. I was overcome.
__________________
Desert185 🇺🇸 (Retired Chemtrail vendor)
-Ram 2500 QC, LB, 4x4, Cummins HO/exhaust brake, 6-speed stick.
-Andersen Ultimate 24K 5er Hitch.
-2014 Cougar 326SRX, Maxxis tires w/TPMS, wet bolts, two 6v batts.
-Four Wheel 8' Popup Camper.
Desert185 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Keystone RV Company or any of its affiliates in any way. Keystone RV® is a registered trademark of the Keystone RV Company.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.