Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 

Go Back   Keystone RV Forums > Keystone Tech Forums > Towing
Click Here to Login

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 04-22-2012, 07:01 PM   #21
rhagfo
Senior Member
 
rhagfo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,218
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRTJH View Post
Add in the extra $8000 inital purchase price, 13qt oil changes, $35 oil filters, $30 Fuel filters, and the price comes closer to equal.
Additionally, you're comparing your 7700 lb fifth wheel with a GVW of about 10000lbs to a 8000 lb travel trailer with a GVW of 11000 lbs.
I'm not saying "DON'T" buy diesel, but there's a heck of a lot more involved in this equation than "simple math" and the price of fuel.
Well my Cummins is only 11qt oil change (only four Qt. more than my old F250 460) and 7,500 to 10,000 mile oil changes.
Filter is only $16 at local Cummins dealer (I could buy a Puralator for about $7.00), fuel filter $20. This is a daily driver 15 mpg around town 12mpg pulling and 20mpg on the highway empty.

The decision was much easier 10 years ago when diesel was cheaper than gas. If you work a diesel once in a while they really don't need tune ups.

All said I would never go back to gas, as my Cummins seems happiest when pulling my 5er!
__________________
Russ & Paula and Belle the Beagle.
2016 Ram Laramie 3500 DRW 14,000# GVWR (New TV)
2005 Copper Canyon 293 FWSLS 32’ GVWR 12,360
Visit and enjoy Oregon State Parks
rhagfo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2012, 08:02 PM   #22
JimEli
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Birch Bay, WA
Posts: 15
5.7 Toyota Tundra.
17 mpg around town.
10 mpg towing 8000# 321RES @ 60-65 mph.
$10 oil filter, 7.5 qts oil, I've never replaced the fuel filter and gas is only $3.65
__________________
Jim & Donna
2011 Cougar High Country 321RES HE
2007 Toyota Tundra 5.7, Prodigy, Air Lift
JimEli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2012, 08:33 PM   #23
LittleJoe
Senior Member
 
LittleJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ottawa Valley
Posts: 329
I prefer diesel and consider my 2004 Cummins to be the last of the non emission engines. In my mind it is worth two of any of the emission nightmares from any of the manufacturers. Best of the new diesels is the 2011 Dmax from that standpoint.

I have worked on diesels for years and have formed my opinions from hands experience. That being said......with the disparity in fuel costs , and the astronomically high parts and repair cost for the new diesels , I would only buy a new diesel for RV pulling if I was pulling at least 15000miles a year at a minimum.
The average guy who pulls there trailer 2-3000miles a year will be much farther ahead $ wise with a gas truck from any of the big manufacturers outfitted for towing, especially if you cant troubleshoot and repair your own.

If you take 10 years to put 200K on your truck buy gas. If you double that, buy diesel. JMHO
__________________
2011 325SRX , Mor-Ryde Pinbox
2004 Ram 3500DRW 6spd,4x4,QC.LB ,340L aux tank
1999 Concours
2014 FJR
2014 Jetta TDI
LittleJoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012, 03:33 PM   #24
Jeffrey11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 25
Have a a Fuzion 412 loaded 18k LBS I tow with a SuperDuty 350 2011 6.7. The only change I made was tires. I average 14mpg with the trailer and can get 19 or 20 empty.
I drive hard and average 70 - 75 on the highway. My old 6.4 got about 8mpg.
Jeffrey11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012, 04:30 PM   #25
dhdb
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: SE Mass
Posts: 20
Bigger TT, smaller TT it all comes down to resistance (wind and/or friction). A smaller TT with under-inflated tires will pull harder than a much larger 5th wheel with properly inflated tires. Keep you TT washed and waxed, proper tire inflation, and proper wheel-bearing maintenance.
dhdb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2012, 01:33 PM   #26
Hansel
Senior Member
 
Hansel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Flowery Branch, Georgia
Posts: 360
I've got a 2000 F-250CC SD with the a trusty 7.3L with over 228,000 miles. When just driving around town I get close to 16mpg but when I bolt on the 2005 Laredo I get about 9-11mpg depending on the amount of hills I'm climbing.

I don't think I'd want to buy a new diesel truck nowadays, Ford is having issue's, Dodge doesn't hold any value, but I will say that Chevy/GMC has my vote if I had to replace my truck. The Govt. has ruined the diesel truck industry IMHO
__________________
2015 XXXXXXXXXXX 5th wheel
2000 F-250CC Powerstoke**DECEASED**
2001 F-250 CCSRW 4X4 7.3L Powerstroke
2003 F-350 CCDRW 2X4 7.3L Powerstroke
Hansel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2012, 02:03 PM   #27
geo
Senior Member
 
geo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: North Texas
Posts: 1,000
I disagree. Ford is doing quite well! I believe the 2011 and 2012 Ford diesel owners here would agree. I also know that there are Dodge owners here on the Forum who would loudly disagree. I also would say that with the Forum rules, political statements are usually frowned upon. Personally, I am very proud that Ford, GM, Dodge, etc., have "stepped up to the plate" to produce a diesel engine that emits less NOx. I think as RVers, most all of us would rather have a clean environment to enjoy rather than go back to the days of smog, etc.

But, the above are just my opinions.

Ron
__________________
2011 Alpine 3640RL (Beauty)
(Gone! Now replaced by Beauty3)
2016 Ford F-450 (The Beast)
Diesel 4x4, DRW, LB, CC
Comfort Ride Hitch
geo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2012, 05:41 PM   #28
jbsmith
Senior Member
 
jbsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Dayton
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhagfo View Post
my Cummins seems happiest when pulling my 5er
I'll second that!

I pulled my 331MKS for the first time on the interstate over the weekend and got 9-11 mpg running 60-65 mph with a head wind. I'm relatively pleased with that, since it's about what I expected.

A newer truck would probably get better mileage, but the old 5.9L CTD in my 2005 is still running strong. I try to keep my speed around 60 mph, but with a little time to get her whistling I've got plenty o' torque to pass with ease when necessary.

With taller tires, I'm geared a little high, resulting in some slow starts unless I really mash on it, but I'm only turning 1600 RPM at 65 mph with the trailer. I try to baby the 48RE transmission as much as possible...weak link behind a great motor.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
__________________
J. B. Smith
Dayton, OH

2012 Keystone Cougar 331MKS
2018 RAM 3500 Laramie 6.7L DRW
B&W Companion
jbsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 03:57 PM   #29
Bigk
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Inland Empire, Ca
Posts: 23
18 - 21 mpg (Not towing)
11 -13 mpg (Towing) avg speed 63 mph.
__________________
2012 Heartland Sundance SD 3000CK
2019 HC 305RL (waiting for 2019)
2007 Laredo 29RK (SOLD)
2016 F350 XLT 4x4 SRW CC LB 6.7L
2007 3500 Dodge DRW CC CTD, 6.7L (SOLD)
16K Husky EZ-Roller Hitch
Bigk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 06:56 PM   #30
Alpinecummin
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Versailles, KY
Posts: 34
i have a 2007 Ram dually 4X4, with the 6.7, six speed automatic and 410 differentials. Empty the truck gets bewtween 16 to 19 mpg on the highway and when pulling the fiver it gets between 9.5 and 12 mpg. This past Monday I pulled the fiver 221 miles and part of the trip was over Jellico Mtn in TN. I was running between 62 - 68 mph and got 11.7 mpg.

Weather, terrian, speed, and what type fuel you use has the most impact on the fuel economy. My truck gets its best fuel mileage on Shell, but I use BP 80 percent of the time. My truck gets its worest mileage on Speedway.
__________________

1977 Avon
2003 Jayco Designer 32FKS
2011 Alpine 3640RL
2007 Dodge 3500
Alpinecummin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2012, 09:47 AM   #31
Tranquilty1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 14
MGP's

It's been ten months and 12,000 miles of full timing. I'm getting a consistent 9mpg with my 2012 F250 6.2, 4:3 rear pulling my 11,000 Laredo 266rl. This is way better than I originally thought. I typically drive around 60 - 62 MPH.
__________________
Laredo 266rl, F250
Tranquilty1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2012, 10:14 AM   #32
rnkburg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: KY
Posts: 386
When it comes to diesel, eliminate all the govt stuff ( smog,cat,emmisions, dpf, etc..) get a good tune for your specific truck and needs and watch the mpg jump. I have a 12v cummins with none of it and a 04 duramax. The duramax gets 23 hwy, and 14 towing a 15k 5er with a boat behind it.

The cummins is around 18 hwy, and less towing but the cummins has a ton of stuff done to it for mods. If buying today I would go back to a 5.9 cummins or a newer if deleted all the stuff or a duramax. It's just my opinion and we all have those.

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
rnkburg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2012, 10:16 AM   #33
Johnnyfry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 394
Mpg

I'm with Geo. we only have one atmosphere and when we F it up, it's gone for good. We can't live in a free for all anymore.

IMHO,

John
__________________
2006 Dodge Cummins 3500 Mega cab, dually
2011Cougar 318SAB
Sidewinder hitch
Johnnyfry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2012, 10:34 AM   #34
SAABDOCTOR
Senior Member
 
SAABDOCTOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: WESTERN,CT
Posts: 2,095
I'll throw in my 2 cents since we still have pennies here ( sorry hank) gas diesel no one will ever win that agrument! yes i work mainly on saabs as the name implies. but have been around others. been burned by ford 6.0 duramax's but my 5.9 sofar has been good have heard horr stories about the newer 6.7 cumins but that beening said the reason for most of the issues is the EPA. get rid of that stuff and they would run fine get better economy. i'll go away now back to my saabs if i can find parts.
__________________
BARNEY AND CHRISTINE
2010 MONTANA 3750FL
2005 DODGE 3500 DUALLY TD
2 RESCUE PUPS: SUSITNA AND CRYSTAL. RIP ALYESKA!
SAABDOCTOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2012, 06:59 PM   #35
Alpinecummin
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Versailles, KY
Posts: 34
I do several RV, boat, farm, and truck shows a year, and I talk to a lot of people that drive diesel pickups and pull a lot of equipment. What I have learned is that it doesn't matter what pickup you own, Ford, Chevy, or Dodge, they all have their problems and the owners think they have the best truck out there! Some of the problems are manufacture defects and some are owner related problems after they turn them up or pull to heavy loads. I have a 6.7 Dodge with 107,000 + miles, and have never had a problem with it. It is stock, and it is staying that way. When I think back, my 1996 and 2001 Dodge 5.9's gave me more problems then this 6.7 in the first 100,000 miles. Once they were out of warranty I turned them up and had more problems! But I had fun with them, they were both great trucks, and I wouldn't own anything but a Cummins!
__________________

1977 Avon
2003 Jayco Designer 32FKS
2011 Alpine 3640RL
2007 Dodge 3500
Alpinecummin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2012, 09:53 AM   #36
rjroling
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Anamosa, IA
Posts: 5
Diesel and 5th wheel comparisons

My first diesel was a '95 Chevy 3500 6.5 2wd DRW CC with a 5 speed. I pulled a 24 ft. aluminum 5er that weighed 6500lbs dry and got 12 mpg from Iowa to Alabama and back. Bought a 29 ft fiberglass 5er (9000lbs) and couldn't get over 60mph in the "hills" of Iowa (9mpg), so I upgraded to the '03 Chevy 3500 Duramax 4x4 CC DRW. Pulling same 29ft I got 12.5mpg IA/AL roundtrip. Upgraded to 35 ft. bunkhouse (10,500lbs), got 10.3 mpg IA/AL roundtrip. Moved to '08 GMC 3500 Duramax CC DRW, pulling 35 ft. IA/AL roundtrip - 9.7 mpg. Just upgraded to Fuzion 405 toyhauler, so far looks like mileage is down around 7, but we'll see on the annual IA/AL trip.

Conclusions - Drive what you like and pull the toy you want. If you can't afford the fuel, you can't afford the toys!!
__________________
2008 GMC Sierra 3500 Crew Cab 4x4 DRW Duramax pulling 2011 Fuzion fz405 Toyhauler
rjroling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2012, 10:04 AM   #37
hankpage
Site Team
 
hankpage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Venice
Posts: 5,346
Somewhere along the way "You have to feed the ponies." In most cases more HP = more fuel. ........ But I still don't understand why a cleaner burning engine burns more fuel and if it is not going into the air, where is it going????? It seems like a vicious circle.
__________________
Hank & Lynn
2007 Cougar 290RKS, E-Z Flex, 16" XPS RIBs ( SOLD .. Gonna miss her ... looking for new 5r)
2004.5 Dodge 2500 QC, LB, 5.9HO, WestTach gauges, Ride-Rite
hankpage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 02:14 PM   #38
Tranquilty1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 14
F250 mpg

It's been over 1 1/2 yrs with my 2012 F250, pulling a Laredo 266rl (11,800lbs). I get a pretty consistent 9-10 mpg when towing and 15-17 mpg when solo. This is way better than I'd originally thought. My F250 is 6.2L gas with a 4:3 rear, not a 4x4.
__________________
Laredo 266rl, F250
Tranquilty1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 06:45 PM   #39
Ken / Claudia
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Fruitland
Posts: 3,357
When I had the truck camper 4450 lbs and pulled boat at 3800 lbs mileage on flats was around 11 over any mountians it was 8 to 9. Boat only around 11mpg. Now with new travel trailer mileage was 8 to almost 10 on first trip, no mountains but alot of head winds. TT has not been over the scales yet, book shows 5576 lbs dry. Normally if it not pulling I use it to drive the coast at 60/70 mph and get around 17. Like others said I don't see much difference in mpg pulling anything.
__________________
2013 24RKSWE (27ft TT) Cougar 1/2 ton series SOLD 10-2021
2013 Ford F350 4x4 CC 6.7 engine, 8 ft bed, 3.55 rear end, lariat package
Retired from Oregon State Police in 2011 than worked another 9.5 years as a small town traffic cop:
As of 05-2020, I am all done with 39 years total police work. No more uniforms for me.
Ken / Claudia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012, 09:37 AM   #40
Festus2
Site Team
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fraser Valley BC Canada
Posts: 7,015
Great MPG

A recent study showed that the average Canadian walks about 900 miles per year. Another but different study revealed that the average Canuck consumes 22 gallons of beer per year. And what does all this mean?

It means that the average Canadian gets 41 mpg. Now how's that for great mileage, eh??
__________________
2008 Cougar 5th Wheel 27RKS
2005 2500 GMC Duramax
Festus2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Keystone RV Company or any of its affiliates in any way. Keystone RV® is a registered trademark of the Keystone RV Company.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.