Can you spell: SOLINDRA ????? That's where the money is going.....
Just looking at a comparative need, fiberoptic cable/internet service, hell, high speed internet service of any kind, has been "identified as a vital need" everywhere in the US. We live in a place where the "very best internet access" we can get is either "cost prohibitive satellite service" which is not reliable in any kind of cloudy/incliment weather, or "high speed DSL" which right now, on my last Frontier speed check, was 5.4mb down/0.6mb upload.
We've had a "government initiative" to provide reliable, low cost high speed internet to every home in America for the past 15 years, yet we don't have any "high speed internet access" in my neighborhood or for the 15 miles toward Gaylord or the 45 miles toward Alpena, with the exception of a couple of "densly populated areas, serviced by a single fiberoptic trunk line that was installed (buried) about 4 years ago.
So, to "somehow believe that the government's initiative of improving the grid to provide adequate electrical service to every home in America" is, IMHO, going to fit nicely in the same "circular file" as the current "high speed internet service to every home in America"...
Hell, if we can't do one, why in the world would anyone believe we (not us, the government) can do the other ??????
PS: I'm still waiting for this area to "catch up to the fiberoptic speeds we had in Pineville, LA in 2007"... That's 15 years ago and technology hasn't caught up yet, I'd suspect the grid improvements will mirror the internet "successful implementation" .....