Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 

Go Back   Keystone RV Forums > Keystone Tech Forums > Tow Vehicles
Click Here to Login

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 03-04-2014, 08:39 PM   #1
SkyPiGG
Member
 
SkyPiGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 55
Half-ton owners... REJOICE!

In the last two RV shows I was at (Hershey/Philly), there seemed to be a major trend towards increasing the half-ton towable market. Using wider stances and lighter material, TT builders are making 30-footers with more than just one slide out light enough for the half-tons. I was amazed at how many coaches there were that targetted the smaller trucks.

Now, grant you... if you browse these forums, you'll find that what a half-ton can tow is all very subjective. But my general guideline is < 700 hitch / < 7K dry.

Anyway, I thought it was remarkable.
__________________
SkyPiGG
2011 Silverado 1500 4WD 5.3L 6-Speed 3.42
2019 Bullet Premier 29RKPR
SkyPiGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2014, 09:08 PM   #2
JRTJH
Site Team
 
JRTJH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Gaylord
Posts: 26,836
You're right. RV's are getting bigger and lighter across the board. The number of ultra lite's and lighter "heavy weights" is growing. Trailer Life just did a comparison article on the Heartland North Trail King Slide 33TBUD. It is 37' long (yup, I didn't mistype that) weighs 7500 lbs empty with a GVW or 9600 lbs. Strangely, the tongue weight (dry) is 624 lbs. Normally, tongue weight range should be 10-15%, and this one is being produced with a tongue weight of 8.3%. So, unless there's some "sleight of hand" going on, either the stats are being marketed "conservatively" or the conventional rules of towing are being challenged..... TL matched this 37' trailer with a Toyota Tundra and reported that with the wide spaced axles, it tows "steady as a rock"

I think we are in for some growing pains in trailer tow ratings with the upcoming SAE guidelines being implemented by the automotive manufacturers which will dramatically lower truck/suv tow ratings and trailer manufacturers building bigger (but lighter) "half ton" trailers that are being designed to match the current half ton tow ratings, not the SAE ones that will apply next year.... I'm not sure if the cart is before the horse or if we're going to see some "oops" coming down the pike in the next year or two.
__________________
John



2015 F250 6.7l 4x4
2014 Cougar X Lite 27RKS
JRTJH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 01:55 AM   #3
TAZ23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Florence WI.
Posts: 336
Another reason trailer manufacturers are going to lighter trailers is that there are a lot more half tons out there than three quarter or one tons. If you only make big heavy trailers, you limit your market share. Its a big segment of the market they dont want to miss out on.
TAZ23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 04:23 AM   #4
KJcachers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 255
I'm worried that ligher will also mean cheaper when it comes to construction quality. Won't affect the MSRP though I bet.
__________________
2013 Keystone Bullet 246RBS
2011 Ram 1500ST Crew Cab 5.7L Hemi w/Tow pack.
KJcachers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 05:39 AM   #5
Bob Landry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,910
Quote:
Originally Posted by KJcachers View Post
I'm worried that ligher will also mean cheaper when it comes to construction quality. Won't affect the MSRP though I bet.
I thought the same thing. With the cost of labor and materials being relatively the same at a given level, the only way to sell a product cheaper and still maintain a profit margin is to build it cheaper. Economics 101. To build it cheaper, you have to reduce the quality or the quantity of materials used, or the quality or quantity of the labor used. Any combination of those does not equal a better product for consumers. Inflation will still raise the price of everything so the end cost is not likely to go down in spite of the introduction of any cost-cutting methods.
__________________
2011 Outback 277RL
2013 F250 XLT Crew Cab 6.2L

Bitter Gun Owner
Bitter Clinger
Armed Infidel
Bob Landry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 06:05 AM   #6
Ram189
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Frederick, Md
Posts: 202
To build a lighter trailer you have to use lighter material.

Lighter material usually means more expensive, higher cost products.

This will definitely drive up the cost of trailers over the next couple of years I am sure.

I just bought a 38' 5th wheel with 3 slides and a bunkhouse that weighs the same as my 2001 30' travel trailer with 1 slide out.

Go figure.
Ram189 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 07:00 AM   #7
JRTJH
Site Team
 
JRTJH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Gaylord
Posts: 26,836
Older aluminum framed travel trailers were built on 10"x2" square tube 3/16" thick steel frame members. They used .063 rigid wall square tubing and welded in place, 3/16" luan glued/screwed to the outside, fiberglass insulation stuffed in the cavities and 3/16" luan installed on the inside. Then .040 aluminum was riveted to the outer shell on expensive RV's, .020 ribbed aluminum was used on the cheaper models and sheet fiberglass was used on some select models. The bottom was insulated with rolls of fiberglass insulation and sealed with .032" rolled aluminum sheeting screwed in place. They weighed "a bunch" !!!!!

Newer models are using 8"x2" or (10 x 2) 5/32 thick steel frame members that are drilled and cut away at "strategic points" to lighten the load. They are built with .032" hardened (for rigidity) aluminum square tube frame members. Foam is applied under pressure with a 1/8" luan interior wall and a 1/8" filon outer wall. Then a vacuum is applied to form a "single component sidewall". The bottom is sealed with coroplast, a lightweight substitute for the bottom insulation and aluminum underbelly.

There is an article in Trailer Life's current issue answering a reader's question about sidewall construction/durability. The answer pretty much states that the older aluminum frames were welded and occasionally a weld would break causing some problems but the "newer" model walls are "held together with the foam and much less likely to come apart".....

So, in "layman's comparison" it appears to this layman, that the thicker older aluminum walls would bend some, welds would hold better and any damage from wear would occur at "an occasional stress produced weld spot". On the newer ones, the tubing is thinner, more at risk of breaking (rather than bending) because it's hardened tubing in a flex type use, and the foam pretty much holds it all together preventing the welds from breaking. I don't know for sure, but it seems to me that "as" (or "if" for the optimists) the foam deteriorates, the frame will be more likely to flex and crack because of the lack of ability to flex caused by the rigid wall thinner tubing.

Of course, I'm sure this will all occur well after the 1 year manufacturer's warranty.

Older wood frame trailers were constructed with clear spruce 2x2 frame members with 2x4 and 2x6 components in key stress locations. Today's are built with 2x3's in key stress positions with some 2x2's in places where components are mounted and 1x2 frame construction. More "space age" adhesives and less screws/staples are being used. Good or bad??? I don't have a clue.... In a couple of places where I could see the wood frame members in my Springdale, they were anything but "clear spruce". In some of them, it would be hard to find a place to fasten anything without hitting a knot or split/void.

The end result, I think, is that as RV's get bigger and lighter, whether the components cost more because of technology, or cost less because of thinner/cheaper materials, the end result will be either put together faster to keep pace with inflation or constructed similar to what we have and cost more but probably not be as durable. I suppose time will tell......
__________________
John



2015 F250 6.7l 4x4
2014 Cougar X Lite 27RKS
JRTJH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 07:09 AM   #8
Festus2
Site Team
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fraser Valley BC Canada
Posts: 7,015
I'm not so sure that the foam helps reduce the weld from breaking but it might help prevent the stud from moving or separating. A crack in the weld may still occur but the aluminum could still be held in place by the foam. From that standpoint, its structural integrity has been comprised - it just doesn't look that way because it appears to be "still in place". I could be "out to lunch" with more layman's thinking.

Does anyone know if the wood that is used in today's studs is the "finger joint" variety or is "one piece" and whether or not one is any stronger than the other?? Finger joint studs are common in today's stick houses......
__________________
2008 Cougar 5th Wheel 27RKS
2005 2500 GMC Duramax
Festus2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 07:32 AM   #9
jsmith948
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Central San Joaguin Valley, CA
Posts: 2,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by TAZ23 View Post
Another reason trailer manufacturers are going to lighter trailers is that there are a lot more half tons out there than three quarter or one tons. If you only make big heavy trailers, you limit your market share. Its a big segment of the market they dont want to miss out on.
I agree that the manufacturers are targeting the lighter truck market - but putting a "1/2 Ton Series" sticker on the side of a trailer does NOT make it 1/2 ton towable. This is a marketing ploy just like the "Polar Plus" sticker. Our "1/2 ton towable" Cougar, when loaded for a 2 wk trip, weighs 10,000# with a 2100# pin weight. But it says '1/2 ton series' right next to the 'Polar Plus' sticker. FWIW
__________________

Jack & Marty
2018 Laredo 298 SRL
2011 F-250 SB Crew Cab 4x4 6.7L
jsmith948 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 08:40 AM   #10
JRTJH
Site Team
 
JRTJH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Gaylord
Posts: 26,836
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsmith948 View Post
I agree that the manufacturers are targeting the lighter truck market - but putting a "1/2 Ton Series" sticker on the side of a trailer does NOT make it 1/2 ton towable. This is a marketing ploy just like the "Polar Plus" sticker. Our "1/2 ton towable" Cougar, when loaded for a 2 wk trip, weighs 10,000# with a 2100# pin weight. But it says '1/2 ton series' right next to the 'Polar Plus' sticker. FWIW
This example of how pin weight "grows" is exactly what I was talking about in a recent post about half ton towable fifth wheels. The 282RES is advertised as "half ton towable with a shipping weight of 7920 and a pin weight of 1470. It grows to over 2100 lbs when ready to travel, just as mine grows to well over 1700 lbs and not even "fully loaded" at 8300 lbs total. Lighter than the "old ones" yes, but "light enough to be called a "lightweight" ??? Not in all cases, that's for certain......
__________________
John



2015 F250 6.7l 4x4
2014 Cougar X Lite 27RKS
JRTJH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 06:24 PM   #11
Randy_K
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Cambridge Ontario
Posts: 249
Has anyone seen the ratings on the new Ford F150 ? I have read that it is 700 lbs lighter with the new construction. < and stronger they say > I would expect if this was all true then the payload would be increased .

The new " 1/2 ton " trucks can carry more then ever.
__________________
Randy

2010 Ford F150 Screw, E rated tires and Air Lift
2013 Passport Elite 23RB
https://i483.photobucket.com/albums/r...ps749334ca.jpg
Randy_K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 06:27 PM   #12
jonbiker
Junior Member
 
jonbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Florida & Tennessee
Posts: 25
A lighter trailer or 5ver can be great, BUT: Last summer we spent 2 1/2 months out west where the temps were 99 degrees during the day. The 30 amp 13,500 btu a/c was just not adequate and the insulation on a Cougar 28SGS was also inadequate. It was a great trailer and our 2012 2500 did a great job. We stepped up to a 34' Montana HC with double the insulation and 2 a/c units. the 2500 did not have enough payload capacity to handle the new 5ver. If you can accept inadequate insulation and a/c, go for it. We were not comfortable.
__________________
2014 3500 Laramie Crewcab SRW 4x4 LB Trailer Package 3.42 (picked up 3/3/14)
2014 Montana High Country 318RE 5th Wheel
2012 Dodge 2500 Laramie Crewcab LB 4x4 Diesel 3.73 Rear Towhaul + Integrated trailer brake (traded)
Prior RVs:
2013 Cougar XLite 28SGS 5th Wheel
2003 Tahoe 36' Toyhauler
2004 All American Sport 41' Toyhauler
2009 Glacier Bay 35' 5ver
2009 Mobile Suites 36RSSB
2003 Dodge 3500 LB 4x4 5.9L 4.10 Rear 6 spd manual PAC Brake
jonbiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 09:16 PM   #13
JRTJH
Site Team
 
JRTJH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Gaylord
Posts: 26,836
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy_K View Post
Has anyone seen the ratings on the new Ford F150 ? I have read that it is 700 lbs lighter with the new construction. < and stronger they say > I would expect if this was all true then the payload would be increased .

The new " 1/2 ton " trucks can carry more then ever.
All the information I've seen says that the 2015's will be lighter and carry more. My guess is that means they are cutting some 700 lbs of the weight out and installing lighter suspension, etc for fuel savings and leaving some of the "lighter build" for payload... Sort of a "best of both worlds" ????
__________________
John



2015 F250 6.7l 4x4
2014 Cougar X Lite 27RKS
JRTJH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 05:18 AM   #14
PT RV`er
Senior Member
 
PT RV`er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Santa Rosa Beach, Fl
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ram189 View Post
To build a lighter trailer you have to use lighter material.

Lighter material usually means more expensive, higher cost products.

This will definitely drive up the cost of trailers over the next couple of years I am sure.

I just bought a 38' 5th wheel with 3 slides and a bunkhouse that weighs the same as my 2001 30' travel trailer with 1 slide out.

Go figure.
I`m with ya on that one. My new 32ft Passport with 2 slides weighs the same as my old 26ft Dutchman with one slide.
Talking about lighter and more durable material - HEMP is where it`s at. If our gooberment would separate Hemp from the MJ category, we would have a wonderful, sustainable, very durable, number one cash crop that could be used in a million different applications.
Sorry, got a little carried away
__________________
2013 Passport 32FB Ultra Lite Elite
`07 GMC 2500HD SLT

PT RV`er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2014, 10:12 AM   #15
audio1der
Senior Member
 
audio1der's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Airdrie, Alberta
Posts: 552
Weight is one factor; length is another. Don't be talked into buying a super long TT just because it is towable based on weight.
Pulling a "long, empty balloon" behind a half ton brings its own challenges.
__________________
2013 Passport 3220BHWE, upgrade axles, Kumho Radial 857's, all LED, TST507 TPMS, Reese DCSC, DIY corner stabilizers
2012 Ram 1500 Sport crew cab, Hemi, 4x4, 3.92 LSD, factory brake controller, S&B CAI w/scoop, Moroso air/oil can, 87mm ported/polished/knife-edged throttle body, Magnaflow exhaust, 180* t-stat, Rear lowered 2", Airlift 1000.
audio1der is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2014, 11:44 AM   #16
JRTJH
Site Team
 
JRTJH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Gaylord
Posts: 26,836
Quote:
Originally Posted by audio1der View Post
Weight is one factor; length is another. Don't be talked into buying a super long TT just because it is towable based on weight.
Pulling a "long, empty balloon" behind a half ton brings its own challenges.
The same can be said for 3/4 ton trucks too. Our 35' Holiday Rambler pulled great behind our long wheelbase 93 F250 and was "squirrely as heck" behind our short wheelbase 99 F250. The trailer was the same, the trucks were "essentially the same" except for wheelbase length.

Your image of a balloon bouncing along behind a truck is a great way to describe what pulling that HR was like......
__________________
John



2015 F250 6.7l 4x4
2014 Cougar X Lite 27RKS
JRTJH is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Keystone RV Company or any of its affiliates in any way. Keystone RV® is a registered trademark of the Keystone RV Company.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.