Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 

Go Back   Keystone RV Forums > Keystone Tech Forums > Tow Vehicles
Click Here to Login

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 06-19-2017, 05:13 PM   #21
busterbrown
Senior Member
 
busterbrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 1,659
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhagfo View Post
Have you considered a F150 EcoBoost? More power all the time and more payload. I believe the 2017's with the Max/Max tow and payloads top out at 7,800# GVWR, haven't looked at the payload numbers, will a bit later. That said some F150 with good trim have Payloads as good or better than 250/2500's.
I looked at buying a new F150 Max tow prior to buying my 3/4 ton RAM. Pricing was not in my favor as the it exceeded what I paid for my new, similarly-optioned RAM by $6-7K. The ride comfort was what I was looking for out of the F150. Instead, I got more payload, a higher stance, larger mega cab, and a much lower payment. This was a no-brainer for me.
__________________
2017 Keystone Bullet 308BHS in Saddle.
2017 RAM 2500 Laramie Mega Cab 4x4 Hemi 6.4L
2008 GMC Yukon XL Denali (SOLD)
Hensley SwiftArrow Control Hitch with 1000 lb Spring Bars
Me, DW, (3) little DS's, and 1 rambunctious Boston Terrier

busterbrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2017, 09:17 AM   #22
kcamp99186
Member
 
kcamp99186's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Fairmont
Posts: 75
I have a 34' Bullet Premier weighing about 6700lbs. My first tow vehicle was aF150 with the Ecoboost engine. It would pull very well at 65 to 70mph with no problems. Stopped well too. I did however bust a rear shock, due to overloading I expect. I installed towing shocks that had springs on them and it did help but I always watched what I loaded. Just traded it in on a F250 diesel and boy what a difference! Pulls just as well but much more stable feel. Go bigger if you can.
kcamp99186 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2017, 07:53 PM   #23
ftrupe
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Nesconset
Posts: 70
Would never think of towing a 5ver with my 2017 f150. I will stick with a trailer of a max weight of 6000 lbs. I drive the truck for pleasure more than towing, and the ecoboost mileage is pretty good. Towing about 11.5, non towing 18 local and 22 highway.
ftrupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2017, 04:28 PM   #24
ncgrl1
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Hudson, N.C.
Posts: 72
I know I am going to get flamed here but we towed our 2015 Cougar 26SAB all over the place with my 2012 Ram 1500 regular cab 2WD short bed, and I was very pleased with the way it handled it. It was much easier pulling the 5th wheel than it was pulling the lighter travel trailer we had before the Cougar. My truck had the 5.7 Hemi with 3.92 rear axle ratio. The only thing I added other than the hitch was a set of Airlift 1000 air bags for $89.00. I pulled it through the mountains of WV, NC, Ky, and SC. and never felt the least bit uncomfortable. I would have no problems at all doing it again. The truck had plenty of power and the Cougar 26SAB pulled like a dream. I even got better mileage pulling the 5th wheel than I did the lighter travel trailer...
__________________
2018 Ram 1500 Limited
2018 Cougar Half-Ton 24RBS
ncgrl1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2017, 04:53 PM   #25
sourdough
Site Team
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: W. Texas
Posts: 17,660
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncgrl1 View Post
I know I am going to get flamed here but we towed our 2015 Cougar 26SAB all over the place with my 2012 Ram 1500 regular cab 2WD short bed, and I was very pleased with the way it handled it. It was much easier pulling the 5th wheel than it was pulling the lighter travel trailer we had before the Cougar. My truck had the 5.7 Hemi with 3.92 rear axle ratio. The only thing I added other than the hitch was a set of Airlift 1000 air bags for $89.00. I pulled it through the mountains of WV, NC, Ky, and SC. and never felt the least bit uncomfortable. I would have no problems at all doing it again. The truck had plenty of power and the Cougar 26SAB pulled like a dream. I even got better mileage pulling the 5th wheel than I did the lighter travel trailer...

Not going to get flamed....just knowing nods of the heads of the folks that have been there done that. If you could read my posts on this forum when I first joined.....well, you may have because they sound just like me.....when I didn't know better
sourdough is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2017, 02:04 PM   #26
theasphaltrv'er
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: 4 Corners ..The land God 4 got
Posts: 203
Everyone says you can't tow a 5er with a 1/2 ton.
__________________
13 F-150 XLT HD Ecoboost
14 Cougar 26SAB 5er
Pullrite SuperGlide 15K
Life is fantastic & gettin
better every day
theasphaltrv'er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2017, 06:13 PM   #27
notanlines
Senior Member
 
notanlines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Germantown, TN
Posts: 6,327
Those of you interested in the tow factor of the F-150 can glean a little info at this site:
http://www.f150ecoboost.net/forum/17...-ecoboost.html
__________________
Jim in Memphis, Wife of 51 years is Brenda
2019 F450 6.7 Powerstroke
2018 Mobile Suites 40RSSA
2021 40' Jayco Eagle
2001 Road king w/matching Harley sidecar
2021 Yamaha X2 Wolverine 1000
notanlines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2017, 03:16 AM   #28
ctbruce
Site Team | Emeritus
 
ctbruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 3,878
A trailer is a huge investment. Using the right sized TV makes more sense than trying skimp by with a might work truck. A lot of us on this forum have tried to tow over weight with a 150/1500, me included. That, for me only lasted until I could buy the right sized truck.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A using Tapatalk
__________________

Chip Bruce, RPh
Kansas City, MO
2016 Impact 312
2017 Silverado 3500HD SRW
ctbruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2017, 04:40 AM   #29
jonnyaiks
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 46
Let's not conflate safety with comfort. If the trailer is within the 1/2-ton's specified limits then it's safe - if it's not then it isn't. When I upgraded to a hd diesel for my old TT, it wasn't because the F-150 couldn't do it safely, it was because I got tired of redlining her up all those big hills.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
jonnyaiks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2017, 06:59 AM   #30
JRTJH
Site Team
 
JRTJH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Gaylord
Posts: 26,976
The situation is, I think, that many novice (and too many experienced) RV'ers tend to either confuse (or use as evidence) the half ton specs to equal trailer capacity. In other words, payload equals tongue/pin weight and max trailer weight equals trailer GVW. Where that falls short is that many omit other cargo, trailer cargo/equipment weight, passengers, and additions to the truck such as running boards, bed liners, heavier tires, and other mods that "eat up" the payload.

Just because a truck has a payload of 1600 pounds doesn't mean you can tow a trailer with a 1300 pound tongue weight and say you have a 19% safety margin. By the time you add the 100 pound hitch, mom, the kids, the pooch, two ice chests, firewood, the bikes and that tool chest.... well, hopefully you get the point I'm trying to make......

I agree, half ton truck can tow safely, in fact, nearly any vehicle can "tow safely" if they are properly equipped and the trailer is within that vehicles capacity and specifications. But nobody can "tow safely" by following "all the maximums for the truck" and applying them to the trailer while ignoring "the rest of the stuff we all carry on every trip. There are two or three current threads on the forum that "apply that concept" to "well, the brochure says the truck payload is 3,000 pounds and Keystone's website says the fifth wheel I want has a pin weight that's only 1700 pounds, so I'm only about half of my payload". It just don't work that way......
__________________
John



2015 F250 6.7l 4x4
2014 Cougar X Lite 27RKS
JRTJH is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2017, 07:26 AM   #31
jonnyaiks
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 46
I would hope that would be obvious... <he says knowing the truth>

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
jonnyaiks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2017, 07:38 AM   #32
Javi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Waco, Tx
Posts: 5,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnyaiks View Post
I would hope that would be obvious... <he says knowing the truth>

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
You need to read some of the towing threads...
__________________
2015 Ford F350 DRW 6.7 Diesel XL
2020 Avalanche 313 RS
Javi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2017, 09:11 AM   #33
B-O-B'03
Senior Member
 
B-O-B'03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,089
Quote:
Originally Posted by notanlines View Post
Those of you interested in the tow factor of the F-150 can glean a little info at this site:
http://www.f150ecoboost.net/forum/17...-ecoboost.html
I browsed through a bit, found this to be very interesting:

"The nice thing about the High Country is that Keystone uses "Helium" technology in the construct of their 5th wheels which drastically reduces overall weight and in our case 1975 pounds"

So, Keystone fills it with helium and it just floats down the road

-Brian
__________________
2014 Bullet Premier 22RBPR - let the camping commence!
2013 F150 Platinum - 5.0 - 3.55 ELD + towing package
B-O-B'03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2017, 09:42 AM   #34
jonnyaiks
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 46
So I have a Montana HC, and I've been interested in what that was. It turns out that most of the weight loss comes from lighter (cable) slides, using Italian poplar instead of luan, and light-weight versions of interior furniture, and overall more aluminum less wood. The helium must come in where they suck it in on the assembly line and talk in funny voices. Don't get me wrong, I love it, but sales gimmicks just annoy me.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
jonnyaiks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2017, 10:08 AM   #35
notanlines
Senior Member
 
notanlines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Germantown, TN
Posts: 6,327
Brian, I had never heard the term until you mentioned it. This is what I came up with on a short search: http://www.allaboutcampers.com/heliu...untry-campers/
Yep, sounds a little like gimmick to me.
__________________
Jim in Memphis, Wife of 51 years is Brenda
2019 F450 6.7 Powerstroke
2018 Mobile Suites 40RSSA
2021 40' Jayco Eagle
2001 Road king w/matching Harley sidecar
2021 Yamaha X2 Wolverine 1000
notanlines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2017, 05:03 PM   #36
CaptnJohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Ocean Isle Beach
Posts: 1,431
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRTJH View Post
The situation is, I think, that many novice (and too many experienced) RV'ers tend to either confuse (or use as evidence) the half ton specs to equal trailer capacity. In other words, payload equals tongue/pin weight and max trailer weight equals trailer GVW. Where that falls short is that many omit other cargo, trailer cargo/equipment weight, passengers, and additions to the truck such as running boards, bed liners, heavier tires, and other mods that "eat up" the payload.

Just because a truck has a payload of 1600 pounds doesn't mean you can tow a trailer with a 1300 pound tongue weight and say you have a 19% safety margin. By the time you add the 100 pound hitch, mom, the kids, the pooch, two ice chests, firewood, the bikes and that tool chest.... well, hopefully you get the point I'm trying to make......

I agree, half ton truck can tow safely, in fact, nearly any vehicle can "tow safely" if they are properly equipped and the trailer is within that vehicles capacity and specifications. But nobody can "tow safely" by following "all the maximums for the truck" and applying them to the trailer while ignoring "the rest of the stuff we all carry on every trip. There are two or three current threads on the forum that "apply that concept" to "well, the brochure says the truck payload is 3,000 pounds and Keystone's website says the fifth wheel I want has a pin weight that's only 1700 pounds, so I'm only about half of my payload". It just don't work that way......
Really sometimes no reason to explain ~~ my Cougar had a published PW of 1705 and the Montana HC is 600# higher. Scaled weights loaded are just under 400# different. Same "stuff" same 2 people. 8' longer... only major diff is a larger RV fridge and extra sofa.
__________________

2022.Montana 3855 BR
2019 F350 6.7 4X4 DRW
CaptnJohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2017, 05:34 AM   #37
fraleywp
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Gainesville
Posts: 28
I think what people are saying here is accurate. Also, if you are towing with an F150, the Ecoboost is far superior to the V8. If you are well under 5k it likely won't matter but as you approach the 7k Mark, the difference in towing between the V8 and Ecoboost is very apparent. The V8 will struggle far sooner than the Ecoboost.

Simply put, the Ecoboost engines, both of them, have a far better performance curve. Too often people get caught up on max hp and max torque. How it delivers this power, up to and including max, is what really matters.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
fraleywp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2017, 08:56 AM   #38
jonnyaiks
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 46
I'm not sure I agree. I had the V8 and my father had the ecoboost. He regretted his choice pretty quickly. He had to run hard to pull heavy, I didn't at all. Despite advertisement, in the real world his fuel mileage hauling heavy was garbage and mine just hummed along. After he blew his first 2 turbos he got rid of it for a V8. He was 80 so he wasn't out there WOT'ing it for fun. I have neighbours with similar experiences. Maybe it's skewed because I have a small sample, but certainly the love affair for the ecoboost is not universal.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
jonnyaiks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2017, 09:57 AM   #39
fraleywp
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Gainesville
Posts: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnyaiks View Post
I'm not sure I agree. I had the V8 and my father had the ecoboost. He regretted his choice pretty quickly. He had to run hard to pull heavy, I didn't at all. Despite advertisement, in the real world his fuel mileage hauling heavy was garbage and mine just hummed along. After he blew his first 2 turbos he got rid of it for a V8. He was 80 so he wasn't out there WOT'ing it for fun. I have neighbours with similar experiences. Maybe it's skewed because I have a small sample, but certainly the love affair for the ecoboost is not universal.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
It must be skewed. It also depends on the year. The newer Ecoboost has a different transmission and there are now three generations of Ecoboost as well. Anecdotal evidence aside, the numbers don't lie. The new Ecoboost (not sure when it starts shipping) only ups the ante. There is now a 10-speed transmission on some models and it will be on all soon.

If you need more anecdotal evidence just head over to F150forums and there is a ton of it there. Most of the conversations are by people who tow on a daily basis. If you tow constantly it seems a nearly universal belief that the 3.5 Ecoboost is the best. There are a few threads that state for daily towing the V8 is better than the 2.6 Ecoboost for the reasons you state. But the 2.6 still has a better power curve. Another odd fact is that the 2.6 Ecoboost with 3.31 rear end is the fastest from 0-60 of all the options. That will likely change when the new 3.5 is out as it has a substantial power increase.

Also, it is not common for people to blow out these turbos unmodified. I think your Dad had a defect. What year was his truck?

The biggest complaint on the Ecoboost has to be the lack of good sounding exhaust upgrades.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
fraleywp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2017, 09:59 AM   #40
jonnyaiks
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 46
His was 2012, mine (non ecob) was 2013. Edit - neighbours' were 2012-2013.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
jonnyaiks is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
f150, ford

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Keystone RV Company or any of its affiliates in any way. Keystone RV® is a registered trademark of the Keystone RV Company.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.