Go Back   Keystone RV Forums > Keystone Tech Forums > Tires, Tires, Tires!
Click Here to Login

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 08-10-2018, 11:44 AM   #11
CWtheMan
Senior Member
 
CWtheMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Taylors, SC
Posts: 1,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by Javi View Post
So, technically I could use these for tires.. Defender LTX M/S - Size: LT245/75R16 120/116 3042 lbs. They are roughly (30.4") the same diameter and width as the OEM

Still 884 lbs. more than the axle limit 3042 x 2 = 6084
"Like said above... don't need 3420 tires... since the wheels are only 3200... and really... even 3200 is overkill since the axles are the weak link at 5200.."

The problem is twofold. Minimum safety is the trailer manufacturer's decision and to top it off they must certify their decision.

The LT tire you suggest could have also been the trailer manufacturer's decision. We can only second guess why in wasn't used. Surely it wasn't because of availability, it's a widely used size and design and very capable of supporting 5200# axles.

Here in this statement from the tire manufacturer is another problem. It's not just Michelin, it's an industry wide standard that supports all vehicle manufacture Original Equipment selections displayed on federal certification labels.

"Michelin: Never choose a tire that is smaller in size or has less load-carrying capacity than the tire that came with the vehicle."
__________________

__________________
An Old Navy Aircraft Mechanic that writes about tires.
Our rig. NC mountain pull-off. US-19.
http://www.irv2.com/photopost/showfull.php?photo=35007
CWtheMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2018, 12:44 PM   #12
JRTJH
Site Team
 
JRTJH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Gaylord
Posts: 13,209
In another recent thread, I think the "real reason" was revealed as to why Keystone and other manufacturers make many of the decisions they make. It's about the cost of the component as much as it is about the suitability of the component. There is a discussion of why Dexter retained the 4400 lb axle after buying ALKO. The statement that was related to the poster by Dexter is because it was a "profitable axle system" and that "replacement parts are more than double the price of the 5200 pound axle parts".... He went on to say that since the axle fails often, it's a "cash cow" for the company, so they keep producing it.

Whether any of that is true is something I can't substantiate, but if the axle "works with the GVW/tires/wheels and meets mandatory minimums, if there are two choices, one costing $100 and the other costing $125. I think we all know which axles would be installed. Same for springs, tires, wheels, stoves, refrigerators, mattresses, TV's, stereo, door systems, windows (and the list goes on and on until the trailer is delivered to the dealer for sale)....

It's about money while meeting minimum requirements, not about what makes the most sense to a buyer or to his satisfaction. After all, it seems the attitude in Elkhart/Goshen is, if you don't buy it, someone else is waiting with cash in hand to put down a deposit.....
__________________

__________________
John



2015 F250 6.7l 4x4
2014 Cougar X Lite 27RKS
JRTJH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2018, 02:11 PM   #13
Javi
Senior Member
 
Javi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Waco, Tx
Posts: 3,304
Yeah... I deal with the cost thingy daily when designing.. But I do try to make some sense in what I choose...

But this is why we're thinking of selling this trailer and moving up to one with 7K axles and a 12" drop frame.. Just need to make up our minds before spending the money for wet bolts and new tires... Tires are just two years old, but we had one get a fencing staple in it last year and I had to buy a Goodyear Endurance at the moment...

So before we begin our camping season in a month or two I need to decide on buying one Carlisle to match the three I have now and move the Endurance to the spare or buy four new Endurance and move the used one to the spare...

OR..... SELL THE 333MKS & Buy a NEW TRAILER..

ANYBODY INTERESTED.....
__________________
'15 Cougar 333MKS
Plenty of truck...
Javi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2018, 07:49 AM   #14
CWtheMan
Senior Member
 
CWtheMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Taylors, SC
Posts: 1,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by Javi View Post
So, technically I could use these for tires.. Defender LTX M/S - Size: LT245/75R16 120/116 3042 lbs. They are roughly (30.4") the same diameter and width as the OEM

Still 884 lbs. more than the axle limit 3042 x 2 = 6084
I've thought it prudent to come back and address your hypothetical replacement tire size above.

Although it does have an identical maximum load capacity as any LT235/85R16 LRE tire, the minimum rim width may be a problem. All LT245/75R16 LRE tires have a minimum rim width requirement of 6.5".
__________________

__________________
An Old Navy Aircraft Mechanic that writes about tires.
Our rig. NC mountain pull-off. US-19.
http://www.irv2.com/photopost/showfull.php?photo=35007
CWtheMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
axle, tires

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Keystone RV Company or any of its affiliates in any way. Keystone RVģ is a registered trademark of the Keystone RV Company.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.